
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
Experiences in Natural life Protection: Individual Progressives' Excursions - 2
Figure out How to Adjust Work, Life, and an Internet based Degree - 3
Turkey's Erdogan denounces Israel-Greece-Cyprus trilateral summit, affirms support for Gaza - 4
The most effective method to Execute a Lung-Solid Eating routine After a Cellular breakdown in the lungs Finding - 5
Find the Effect of Web-based Entertainment on Psychological wellness: Exploring the Advanced Scene Securely
6 US States for Fly Fishing
Releasing Learning Experiences: A Survey of the \Learning Made Fun\ Instructive Application
Watch SpaceX launch powerful ocean-mapping satellite for Europe and NASA early Nov. 17
Figurine of a woman and a goose offers peek at prehistoric beliefs
Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin launches landmark Mars mission in New Glenn rocket’s first big test
Are protests pushing Iran's Islamic regime toward a tipping point?
Getting ready for a Mechanized World: 10 Positions That computer based intelligence Could Dominate
Watching ‘Home Alone’ with the kids this holiday season? Brace yourself for '6-7.'
Procter & Gamble changes Crest toothpaste packaging to address Texas AG fluoride concerns













