
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
'Wicked: For Good' was filmed at this surreal National Park in Egypt - 2
Meet the Artemis crew in NASA's first astronaut mission to the moon in more than a half-century - 3
Mexico says a third of 130,000 missing people might be alive, fueling criticism from families - 4
Virtual National Science Foundation internships aren’t just a pandemic stopgap – they can open up opportunities for more STEM students - 5
Vote in favor of Your #1 sort of pie
Audits of Espresso Types: Which Mix Is for You?
10 Fundamental Tips and Deceives to Lift Your Cell phone's Exhibition
How much would you pay to meet a Real Housewife? At BravoCon, the limit does not exist.
Manual for Tracking down Spending plan Agreeable Travel Objections
Discovering a true sense of harmony: Contemplation and Care Practices
Thousands of New York City nurses set to strike Monday if deal isn't reached with hospitals
No red, no long shorts: The fashion rules Joe Burrows lives by
Manual for Purchasing a Modest Jeep Wrangler for Seniors
NASA's Artemis astronauts enter final preparations for Moon mission













